ugh benioff is peak virtue signaller
-
I suspect that if people knew the actual cost for some of these interventions, they'd balk. Looking at one of the programs Benioff supported — their *goal* is to spend $30m on rent subsidies for 800 families in the Bay. That's nearly $40k/family for a short-term patch.
Strongly suspect that the better use of that money would be to help people relocate to areas with less mature but high-growth economies (and ideally favorable local politics). Why on earth would you subsidize rent in the most expensive rental market in the country?
-
-
Bad optics shipping people who generally dont want to go (homeless) to 2nd tier cities that dont have the homeless services that california cities do...also resistance from those cities facing an influx of homeless... if you mean relocating middle class labor..thats another story
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Because the human and political costs of relocating large masses of indigent people are enormous. See: every refugee crisis ever.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.