The idea that “too much” wealth/value creation is a bad thing is a bug the political left needs to patch ASAP. Sustainability matters — it’s possible to borrow against the future at a bad rate — but slow growth (or even regression) as a political aesthetic is super concerning
I think it goes beyond that, to e.g. tearing down historic buildings, gentrification, destroying the “character” of neighborhoods. In other words: change. You really can’t advocate fast growth *and* static cities
-
-
Destructive change is as unevenly distributed as wealth. In fact, inversely correlated. Those who benefit the most from change transfer the ill effects to those who benefit least.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.