You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
I certainly don't know that. My expectation is that most humanities work is worthwhile. I base "worthwhile" on a strong prior, which I don't know if you share: information about what it means to be human is incredibly valuable for its own sake, worth spending money to acquire.
This is super, super important: how much money? Because IMO the Q isn't whether some scholarly work in the humanities is worth paying a great deal for — of course it is — or whether you have to tolerate some junk/bloat — of course you do. But this is a tradeoff, not a binary.
Good question, albeit it depends on what the end goal is. We can't use money to optimize for average quality of paper. More funding would temporarily free up more academics to peer review, but for-profit academic publishers will merely launch more journals in response.
So, what else? A metric used by many humanities-inclined folks is to look at the quality of governance and public debate around us, and if it's bad, pronounce that the humanities are underfunded. This is remarkably crude, but IMO not without merit
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
