.@Meaningness actually suggests registering Sokals & requiring PhD students to produce them, which is simultaneously so brilliant & so obvious that it makes the media hot take look like it was drafted in crayonhttps://twitter.com/Meaningness/status/1047516944130351104 …
-
-
Show this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It will be interesting to see how the current academic process handles an open deluge of papers generated by improved (and improving) recursive transition networks and the like.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Like a Chaos Monkey for academic journals.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Chaos Monkey but for academia ... maybe we can found a Silicon Valley startup for thishttps://twitter.com/Meaningness/status/1047516476595429377 …
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
Making Sokaling a routine part of the academic process would go a long way towards fixing it, I think. A few dozen Sokalings are a good start to raise awareness, but if—say—5% of all submitted papers were Sokals, reviewers and editors would become much more careful.
How would this work in practice? A paper would have to be registered as a Sokaling before first submission, along with an explanation of what the author thinks is wrong with it. A cryptographic time-locked database could ensure honesty about this.