I’m dying https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.wsj.com/amp/articles/fake-news-comes-to-academia-1538520950 …pic.twitter.com/HI5XAppY6y
Show this thread
-
An academic journal’s reviewers very arguably condoned abusing students on the basis of their skin color and gender Is that not “deeply disappointing”?pic.twitter.com/oaiXIqUwUy
Show this thread
I recommend reading the full reviewers' comments (via @michaelkeenan_0): https://twitter.com/michaelkeenan_0/status/1047550450696781824 …
IMO, comments on the "experiential reparations" paper undermine the Sokal angle ("the paper is overpopulated with terminology"), but do depict a real lack of concern/self-awareness
-
-
Writing for
@AreoMagazine, the authors are transparent about the fact that some of their papers are intended to reveal systemic ethical failures within disciplines & others are standard Sokal, absurdity obscured by buzzword flashbangs. Very diff goals, might undermine each other?Show this thread -
IMO it's unfortunate that the mainstream punchline might be "haha how is Fat Studies a thing," but my understanding is that the paper advocated fat-accumulation contests alongside muscle-building contests to "overcome anthropometry," which does seem absurdhttps://twitter.com/KivrinAiun/status/1047479994606407680 …
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Loosely feels like a case of perverse incentives at play
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.