One problem w/ Twitter is that it can be hard to get much engagement at all @ <1000 followers. Social incentives push toward more replies, fewer top-level tweets. And I think a lot of the potential value is in getting those fleeting spur-of-the-moment ideas out therehttps://twitter.com/webdevMason/status/1047148366637883392 …
-
Show this thread
-
Replying to @webdevMason
I definitely feel this. After reading and speaking to others with larger followings, it seems like ~1k-2k is an optimal follower count. At that point, most q’s earn a number of responses with high signal:noise. And iirc,
@visakanv found that quality begins to decline around 5k?1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @jtaylorhodge @webdevMason
There’s more unwanted noise but I still prefer it to having fewer followers because there are more quality responses too. Just takes a while to recalibrate your fingertip feel
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
I think like 150 high quality + diverse followers is the dream (thoughtful + novel responses), I have maybe like 20-30 at the moment
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes
I feel ridiculously fortunate wrt follower quality
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.