You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
Which is *more resistant to exploitation by competent sociopaths*? A society built on the best modern conception of virtue ethics (or adjacent philosophies) or a society built on the best modern conception of consequentialism/utilitarianism (or adjacent philosophies)?
I used to think consequentialism was stronger, as it's tough to fake long-run results— if someone leaves a stream of unhappy people behind them, there you have it. But it also gives people a lot of leeway to behave in apparently unethical ways if they can offer convincing excuses
AFAICT, the main weaknesses of virtue frameworks involve (relatively common) edge cases, inconsistencies in managing tradeoffs & often sort of hand-wavy "do it to be awesome" justifications. But it's actually expensive to consistently signal virtue & IMO quite sociopath-resistant
A society based on the best bourgeois virtue ethics.
Virtue ethics is by nature bourgeois 
The thing is, most of the philosophical commitments chosen in adulthood seem post hoc to me: it gives a justifying framework for whatever the individual was going to do anyway. With religion (childhood) and politics (late teens) this can be more complicated.
As for unreasonable people, they will probably use a cherry-picked combination that fits their preferred course of action. Still, your question stands in terms of which school they will most likely exploit publicly?
Are you talking about sociopaths using disingenuous moral arguments to manipulate others/society, or just sociopaths trying to appear moral despite not being moral?
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
