I'm *super* excited about genetically modified humans. Looking forward to people who are not only healthier, more cognitively flexible and more physically capable, but also happier and more altruistic
-
-
Replying to @webdevMason @natfriedman
I think it's a genuine possibility that human beings will solve some of our worst, seemingly-intractable cooperation problems as a result of modifying ourselves away from our species baseline on tribalism/aggression
4 replies 0 retweets 61 likes -
Replying to @webdevMason @natfriedman
tired: "you can't fix human nature" wired: "we'll see about that"
1 reply 4 retweets 61 likes -
Replying to @visakanv @natfriedman
Gotta start playing god like we're in it to win it
2 replies 2 retweets 55 likes -
Helping complex, paradoxical humans on the *individual* level is an extremely difficult technical problem - I can only imagine this (and this is how I work) with massive buy-in from the individual. But on larger scales -- we are frequently amazing, and the best is yet to come.
1 reply 0 retweets 17 likes -
Replying to @TheAnnaGat @webdevMason and
Agreed. Our baseline when operating in structured groups larger than Twitter echo chambers is creating skyscrapers and going to the moon, not tribalism and aggression. We’re the only eusocial mammalian species, and we’re honestly not that bad at it.
2 replies 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @keithwhor @TheAnnaGat and
I'm not arguing we're not "frequently amazing," but I would say that we're staggeringly bad at certain types of cooperation problems, some of which create legit existential risk
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @webdevMason @keithwhor and
That's very true. Crowds don't have brains the way people do. But this gets me right to my point: understanding and motivating an *individual* is super complicated and thus the buy-in more problematic. But a group, when motivated the right way.... That's some fast cool stuff!
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @TheAnnaGat @keithwhor and
Totally, but the proper layer to work at is super circumstantial... like, in this work I've been doing on child education, it's become increasingly clear that all the levers have fallen into a stable arrangement that's very difficult to move despite the high cost of failing to
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @webdevMason @keithwhor and
Anna Gát Retweeted Anna Gát
That's a VERY important point. Establishing cooperation vs sustaining it are two very different beasts. I've just read
@nayafia /https://twitter.com/TheAnnaGat/status/1041334744141717504?s=19 … / --- note what she says about *context*
Anna Gát added,
Anna Gát @TheAnnaGatA must-read take on Elinor Ostrom’s Governing the Commons by the brilliant@nayafia. "Ostrom refuses to create a model based on the conditions she identified, insisting only upon a “framework”, because she believes every situation is different..." = WOW. ht@michael_nielsen pic.twitter.com/du3xnND6xr1 reply 0 retweets 5 likes
This looks like a book I desperately need in my life
https://www.amazon.com/Governing-Commons-Evolution-Institutions-Collective/dp/0521405998 …
-
-
Replying to @webdevMason @TheAnnaGat and
You absolutely need that book. I was just coming in here to recommend it. The unsolved sub-problem is how to get the solutions to managing common pool resources work at larger scales, where local knowledge & compliance monitoring break down.
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.