Fundamentally, venture capital is the business of identifying & believing in ambitious people who need someone to believe in them. The greater the extent to which they're underestimated, the more you stand to gain — why is this *never* articulated?
-
-
In other words, “the idea seemed crazy so they ALMOST couldn’t find funding” is exactly what you should expect to see if the system *is working*
Show this thread -
If you believe both (a) good entrepreneurial ideas matter & (b) VC is systemically biased in some direction that makes it a poor evaluator of ideas, you should predict that a fresh team is about to come in & wipe the floor with the good ol’ boys
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
What's Zvi getting wrong here?https://thezvi.wordpress.com/2015/05/15/in-a-world-of-venture-capital/ …
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Right. The sectarian investment firms SHOULD outperform standard firms, of the underrepresentation thesis is correct. The market is running an epic test at scale, and we’ll know the answer in 15 years.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
