One subtle problem with standardized tests is that they need sufficiently "hard" questions to produce results on a bell curve, and chasing this tail may cause a descent into pure trivia. This is how "emollient" & "adumbrate" end up on the SAT, where they can make & break futures.
-
Something is going to make and break futures. What should it be?
-
-
Futures only need to be broken if too many people want the same future they can't all have. There is no reason why everyone couldn't have their own unique future they love.
-
The problem is that too many people don't develop a 'future they'd love' in their minds, not that society doesn't allow them to have it. (I mean things they'd love doing/thinking/creating, not a status they think they'd love, of course.)
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
The critical thing is that it has to work in practice. Most attempts to manifest cosmic justice talk about their intended effects and ignore their actual effects.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Computer Adaptive Tests like GMAT, with IRT scoring, can overcome this issue.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.