Wow, those are hard words...
One subtle problem with standardized tests is that they need sufficiently "hard" questions to produce results on a bell curve, and chasing this tail may cause a descent into pure trivia. This is how "emollient" & "adumbrate" end up on the SAT, where they can make & break futures.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Something is going to make and break futures. What should it be?
-
Have been thinking about this question *a lot* lately
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Huh? The actual problem is that the SAT has been watered down time and again such that it now has a low ceiling and poor discrimination at the right tail.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- Show replies
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Much of the time, they're identifying students whose parents will do whatever it takes to *make* their kids win — a former dean of admissions at Stanford wrote a great book on the growing numbers of these groomed applicants & how they flounder in adulthoodhttps://www.amazon.com/How-Raise-Adult-Overparenting-Prepare-ebook/dp/B00OO2LJS2 …
End of conversation
-
-
-
Is it really unambiguous that "emollient" & "adumbrate" are pure trivia? It’s not hard to make the case that aptitude, intellectual curiosity and conscientiousness would make one more likely to know them.
-
Aptitude, intellectual curiosity, & conscientiousness make a person more likely to know a lot of trivia within fields of interest; someone without these traits knows fewer extraneous facts. A well-read kid will do well on these tests — but a prep-drilled kid can surpass him.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.