One thing you have in real life is people who might just do the test for you. Or for anyone that pays them. Generally, as long as trade is possible it's very unclear what it means for someone to "have a competency" in this general sense.
A good test is one that successfully identifies a range of relevant competencies when: - The takers are not placed under time pressure - The takers have access to any resources they'd like to use that are generally available to them in life
-
-
-
"Generally available" is crucial, for this reason... but I'll point out that I've seen some genuinely ingenious tests, ones where the ability to vet & hire a replacement taker would in and of itself be an incredibly valuable skill
- 10 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- 6 more replies
-
-
-
I hate coding on a sheet of paper.
-
Like, why would you ever do that
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Just got handed a syllabus for my new physics class. “The grade will be based entirely on a take-home final. There will be suggested homework but it is not to be turned in”
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Right whiteboard interview recently?
-
Rough*
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Seems as though you are describing the opposite of the EU education model: They emphasize oral exams much more emphatically.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.