You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
Well, usually these rubrics are designed, not, because instructors are incapable of evaluating work, but because it is *very* difficult to evaluate work fairly. If everything is your best guess the standard you use on the 20th project is guaranteed to be different than the 1st.
All this assumes that it is in some sense necessary to *rank* students rather than evaluate their progress individually, which — whether fair or not — has a lot of arguably concerning social effects
While ranking is really toxic even "evaluating their progress" goes too far in my view. If a child starts a project it is *their* project. The proper role of an educator is to help it according to the *child's criteria* - not to judge whether it fits a preset agenda.
So code doesn't compile, screw it, send them on to the next "class"?
I don't think ranking is the crucial requirement. It's mostly about pass/fail. They get a stamp from the university saying they've learned certain things. That stamp then becomes a (crude) signal in things like hiring decisions.
The grade beyond pass/fail should serve mostly as personal feedback, not ranking. If you get a low grade and you feel you've delivered something near perfect, that might trigger you to investigate what's wrong. Very crude, as feedback goes, but better than nothing.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
