The demand for normally distributed student rankings is central to the problem. Diverse, self-directed projects might be hard to numerically score/rank, but "I can't evaluate a student's competencies based on real work" would be an inane claim.
-
-
Show this thread
-
I was once arguing that students should be able to code their own projects, even marketable products, without being limited by a rubric that might create tension between "best score" & "best product." My acquaintance: "But then how do we know they've really learned to code?"
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.