The Art of Woke / Wokeonomics
-
-
In healthy communities, executing norm-enforcing punishments (e.g. shaming) tends to have diminishing returns. If you don’t do it too much, you do get some social capital, which makes it worth doing when it’s socially uncomfortable.
1 reply 2 retweets 38 likesShow this thread -
Diminishing returns on norm enforcement ensures that (a) aggressive people don’t rule the roost, and (b) there’s room for norms to fundamentally change if new ones become too commonplace to punish-for-reward.
1 reply 2 retweets 35 likesShow this thread -
If you can consistently buy social capital with norm-enforcing at the same rate — or even an increasing rate! — you can actually specialize in just doing that. That can be the bulk of your social life.
2 replies 8 retweets 55 likesShow this thread -
Now we see increasingly clever ways for people to be in the wrong, new social products for people to buy via agreement, e.g. microaggressions. It feels positive-sum because the victims are the out-group... even if they weren't the out-group before.pic.twitter.com/nYQTtQzGsq
3 replies 3 retweets 34 likesShow this thread -
This Tweet is unavailable.
Not exactly — I think "being annoyed" is mostly not within our control, and it's not hard for me to see why some of these comments would annoy someone, even make them feel subtly the way the table suggests. But resolving this via public shaming is a new & IMO harmful development.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.