So you're saying that if you told the kid that he will break his neck that is less scary than the "terrible consequences you have in store for him"? Your consequences are more horrible than death itself?
-
-
What do you think is the rate of broken necks in children who don't fear their parents vs. those who do?
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @webdevMason @Dam_Nuwen and
Coming from the last dregs of a generation that occasionally had unsupervised space to run wild, climb trees, roll down hills, bike freely, etc., I'm pretty concerned about the ramifications of treating children as though they're suicidal morons, especially via fear and force.
0 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
I'm just not sure why you assume he wouldn't get a foot or so up, look down, get frightened, decide to come down, maybe need some help, etc. It's an opportunity to learn from direct experience or an opportunity to reinforce compliance without any exposure to real-world risk
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @webdevMason @Dam_Nuwen and
Not saying "don't warn your children about the dangers around them," I'm saying that children are actually pretty good at evaluating obvious, visible risks, especially once they've been pointed out, & that exploring them may actually be an important aspect to their development.
0 replies 0 retweets 1 like
Adults are terrible at evaluating risks to their kids, in this cultural moment erring hard on the side of total risk avoidance. I think instilling fear-compliance as a survival strategy is pretty harmful, but separately I think there's a high cost to having zero trust in children
-
-
Adults are also terrible at empathising with their children and generally have no idea why they do what they do.
0 replies 0 retweets 1 likeThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.