“Compliance Acquiescent Disorder”pic.twitter.com/wcTeQz4t63
-
Both theories (and the parody "CAD" too) take for granted that your being subject to a stream of commands is an immutable fact of nature.
It’s just way easier for people to grasp “reform this system” than “understand this system starting from first principles & then decide to what extent and in which ways to interact with it.” Wanting a better autopilot is maybe OK, if you understand that that’s what it is?
-
-
Don't get it. Which system?
-
The point as I see it is that often people want institutions to be changed so as to give them better command streams rather than allow them to interact with them on their own terms.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
The autopilot is an interesting analogy here. I'd like to think that one should never be on autopilot when dealing with institutions. But then why does it make sense to trust the autopilot in an airplane ...
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Is there anywhere besides twitter you can get into these kinds of conversations? I always thought maybe Berkeley coffee shops but, nope
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.