Outrage is now a sort of forking mechanism that slices new communities out of power sparring over object-level territory so arbitrary that rules like “don’t eat a burrito served to you by a white person” emergehttps://twitter.com/esyudkowsky/status/1010501006277267462 …
-
-
Trying to do good by eg speaking out against racism is very often the path to becoming a target of outrage. The safest path is to stay silent on all social justice issues.
-
It’s super dangerous if you think you know the rules, because you don’t. If you commit a lot of attention to the enforcers & prioritize not stepping on their toes over even performing the norms, you’ll be better off
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
The safest using current metrics anyway. In my experience if you can correctly predict better success metrics, you can often skirt 'enforcers' -- which is why enforcers tend to punish perceptiveness and those who operate outside their success criteria.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
when i realized that sjws also like le guin, who stands for the opposite of all that, i was enlightened
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I feel like most individuals are part of the outrage w/o realizing it, just tweeting personal opinions, getting some likes/retweets and interacting with followers. But it's perceived as an outrage mob by the receiver because of the shear volume of tweets. Is that naive?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.