I think you basically can't go wrong trying to understand your desires, as long as you also understand that they're not all necessarily stable & it's possible to be wrong about them. This is true of your destination & path, too, but there are additional risks there...
-
-
Replying to @webdevMason @DavidDeutschOxf
I think destination-focus is often preferable to path-focus because it (a) gets you closer to thinking about desires & (b) gives you a reference point, coordinates that you can notice yourself moving closer to or further from. Still, the failure mode you're noting is very real
1 reply 0 retweets 9 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Yeah I think one should basically seek to have fun/do what they want right now and destinations,paths,etc. should just be theories on how to act so you can have fun indefinitely. Or more and more fun as you go.
2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
To illustrate the difference. Suppose you enjoy being creative about something. Then you should be doing it right now but also think about how to build a support system that will allow you to do it over time. That may mean pursuing certain roles or building certain relationships
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
OTOH you have corporate ladder climbing. It might superficially look very similar to that but really people are not doing what they want and are hoping that one day they will finally get to do what they want, be happy and there will be cake. And the cake if often a lie.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MatjazLeonardis @kareem_sabri
Happiness/satisfaction is the ultimate guide. The feedback loop is super tight. If you're not happy, it's a red flag to step back & figure out what you want. If you *are* happy, it's good to know which destinations are available & think about which ones really meet your desires
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @webdevMason @kareem_sabri
I think that's actually a good thing to know even (or especially) if you are unhappy. The main reason unhappy people get stuck is because their unhappiness is preventing them from figuring out new paths and destinations even if they sort of know what they want.
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @MatjazLeonardis @kareem_sabri
Sometimes true, but I think stable unhappiness is more often either (a) thinking you know what you want, but disregarding evidence against it (the corporate ladder scenario), or (b) disowning what you really want, e.g. because it violates what's expected of you
1 reply 0 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @webdevMason @kareem_sabri
Interesting. What would be an example of b)?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Generic scenario: kid comes from fairly wealthy family, gets obsessed w/ theater; his parents are initially supportive (extracurriculars make good resume items), but cool on it as he ages. He starts to consider it a low-level hobby → stops seeking mastery → gets bored with it
-
-
(I think it's pretty easy to be unhappy doing something you generally love if you don't allow yourself to do it in a context where you can seek mastery, and if you've internalized the belief that it's fine for leisure but a waste of time, you're likely to find yourself there.)
1 reply 0 retweets 10 likes -
In reality "all life is problem-solving" (Popper). In reality, Waste of time=When you don't love the problem. In current practice, when you're young, people are continually wasting your time. This can lead to internalising ideas like "OK as a hobby" with dire results as you say.
1 reply 4 retweets 31 likes - Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.