If I answered with "programming languages are artifacts amenable to analysis by the tools of academic programming language theory" then I can transform the problem to one that I also don't know the answer to! Cc @chrisamaphone https://twitter.com/chrisamaphone/status/964144596132466690 …
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
seems kinda circular no?
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
"A computer language that people program in." Or something else, depending on the context. It's a vague term, and that's fine; and this is a vague definition, and that's fine. Not everything needs a precise definition, and most time spent arguing about definitions is wasted.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
user interfaces like those presented by Word and Eclipse can definitely be productively cast as programming languages. a few of the other examples, e.g. CSS and HTML, seem more like data structures used by the "web browser" programming language.
-
I wonder where the 7% of people who think JavaScript is not a programming language are coming from. I can't think of any sense of the phrase where JavaScript doesn't count, but Java does.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
instead of defining the term, I'll give some examples of things outside the computer domain that might be understood and studied as programming languages: LeWitt's wall drawings, plays, recipes, laws, wishes, natural language, knitting patterns, scores for music and dance
-
I like to talk about slide rules and Jacquard machines too!
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
cognitive psychology. PhD