cognitive psychology. PhD 
What's the most effective way to communicate theories of cognition and design for practical application? A stodgy, natural language, philosophical treatise is probably not the way. Some perspectives:
Show this thread
Simon and Newell in 1972: psychological theories should be computer programs. Natural language permits too much ambiguity, which is used to fill in any unexplained hole in a theory.pic.twitter.com/4bQfm6fCz9
-
-
Green et al. in 1995: cognitive theories applied to design should be vocabulary, a set of words that synthesize important aspects of the theory.pic.twitter.com/NnRtI7Jp7V
Show this thread -
Bill Gaver in 2012: a designed artifact is a "theory nexus" that embodies a range of theories. We can better understand artifacts when "annotated" with specific dimensions.pic.twitter.com/5qLhJlA613
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.