"Tools researchers are folk psychologists, weekend anthropologists, armchair sociologists. The claim that cognitive support is not studied at all is quite incorrect, but the characteristics of that study is of a craft-like discipline, not a science-like discipline."
-
Show this thread
-
Design knowledge of PL/SE tools is embedded in tacit knowledge of users/creators, or implicitly in design of existing tools.pic.twitter.com/sptLo6nsXv
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likesShow this thread -
"Ignorance of the principles of cognitive support presents no absolute barrier to development of better forms of tools, so long as good designs are preserved and accumulated within the communal storehouse of known tools."
1 reply 0 retweets 1 likeShow this thread -
From "Cognitive Support in Software Engineering", Walenstein 2002. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.158.8227&rep=rep1&type=pdf …
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likesShow this thread
Without underlying theories, SE research involving cognitive support suffers from e.g. "concept and lexicon poverty."pic.twitter.com/fkiKHvV6OY
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
cognitive psychology. PhD