I'm consistently surprised by the lack of depth in programming psychology work. Search Google Scholar for "program readability", see all top-cited work. Consistently, the only methodology: literally ask people whether they think code is readable, and check for agreement.
-
-
You would get laughed out of the field presenting this stuff at a psychology conference instead of ICSE. Imagine, "To analyze racism in job hiring, we surveyed a group of managers to ask 'do you think you're racist?'" You have to validate with external measures...
Show this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
cognitive psychology. PhD