I know nothing about this, so I can’t confirm or deny that, but IIRC there was evidence to suggest it does generalize more than you might think… but again, I’m totally uneducated here, and I know none of the nuance.
-
-
Replying to @lexi_lambda @sigfig and
Yeah I was also under the impression that negative results on exploratory learning were based on classroom settings, where it seems unsurprising to me. I guess it's time to actually engage with the research...
@soylentqueen (or anyone) have starting point recs?1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @disconcision @lexi_lambda and
A lot of empirical literature does focus on classrooms, but the consensus is that well-guided/scaffolded instruction outperforms constructivist approaches for individuals as well. I like this wiki: https://andrewcerniglia.com/phd/workflow/example/working%20memory.html …
1 reply 2 retweets 11 likes -
Replying to @sliminality @disconcision and
I'm very happy to discuss further in DMs, but I don't champion this view outside of LS research circles anymore, since my experience is that these sorts of discussions often devolve into non-falsifiable assertions and I'm not trying to deny anyone's personal experiences.
1 reply 0 retweets 7 likes -
Replying to @sliminality @soylentqueen and
OMG, yeah, debating constructivists is a pointless activity because you're questioning their mystical experiences, which isn't something that can be done rationally.
1 reply 0 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @ShriramKMurthi @soylentqueen and
I at least wasn't debating, just relaying a personal experience about what didn't work. Wish it did.
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
-
Replying to @ShriramKMurthi @soylentqueen and
deech Retweeted deech
deech added,
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @deech @ShriramKMurthi and
I wonder if there's any research on constructivism and affect. A hypothesis: guided learning, particularly in classrooms, is great for knowledge acquisition and bad for motivation, but vice versa for unsupervised exploration.
2 replies 0 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @wcrichton @deech and
Geoffrey Litt Retweeted Geoffrey Litt
This is exactly what I've been wondering about lately! It seems like the metric we choose for "successful learning" will strongly bias ideas on which methods work well. Maybe constructionism is arguing for a new yardstick, in addition to new methods?https://twitter.com/geoffreylitt/status/1172580627708690432 …
Geoffrey Litt added,
Geoffrey Litt @geoffreylittIntrigued by this! as someone w/o much background in this area: Is deliberate practice actually in tension with Papert's ideas? Also, I wonder if constructionism helps build the motivational foundation to persist through the hard work of deliberate practice? https://twitter.com/hillelogram/status/1172519624778403843 …Show this thread2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes
I think part of the challenge is separating the good parts of constructionism from the entirety of Papert’s ideology. Deliberate practice is actually opposed (somewhat) to his version. See https://morganya.org/research/2018-Ames-CSCW-Constructionism.pdf …
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
cognitive psychology. PhD