I train Rust since 4 years (Meetup, Hack & Learn and actually as a paid trainer for 3 years now) and I _hate_ it when people bring up "learnability" in language RFCs. Most of the time, it's a bit of anecdata, scrapped together.
-
Show this thread
-
Replying to @Argorak @ManishEarth
We tried something slightly structural in this direction and it was useful I think. https://arxiv.org/abs/1901.01001
2 replies 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @wcrichton @ManishEarth
Glancing over if before I step on the plane, 2 things caught my eye: 1) you quote numbers from the survey. The problem is that there's no comparison numbers with other languages (which are hard to get by, but I would have mentioned that).
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
We literally don't know if our language is good or bad there. Being part of a teaching foundation, 25-50% drop-out rates are not _unusual_. (Note, anecdata!)
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
That's totally fair. I can't rigorously back the claim that Rust is significantly more or less hard to learn than other languages. Only that anecdotally people seem to struggle with it in practice (and it certainly has a reputation as a difficult language).
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
cognitive psychology. PhD