The ETI's performance was shaped by its structure, including co-funding by six incumbent energy firms. This affected appetite for risk - with a tendency to focus on incremental innovations and outputs.
Show this thread
Fantastic new article by @AnnaHolliday on the Energy Technologies Institute. It was founded to accelerate low carbon innovation to meet climate targets. What did it get right (and wrong), and what lessons can current organisations like @Catapult_UK learn?https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2210422421000204?dgcid=author …
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Glad to see this published. Well done Anna on a timely and important article.
-
Thanks so much Matt
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Looks really internet. Is there a non-paywalled version?
-
Thanks. I'm not sure - but
@AnnaHolliday should be able to let you know. - Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Wow - just read the abstract and will be fascinated to understand how the conclusion (mentioned in the abstract) that
@the_ETI pursued "more incremental technologies and outputs"... Certainly didn't feel that way working there@becksboo21@Andy1Boston@haines_g -
Thanks for this reaction George, I'm interested to know what other ex-ETIers think..
@CultivateInnov may also have some thoughts! I'd be happy to have a chat about my conclusions & get your feedback- I'm including the work in another paper so my thinking is still ongoing! - Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.