Preskoči na sadržaj
Korištenjem servisa na Twitteru pristajete na korištenje kolačića. Twitter i partneri rade globalno te koriste kolačiće za analize, personalizaciju i oglase.

Za najbolje sučelje na Twitteru koristite Microsoft Edge ili instalirajte aplikaciju Twitter iz trgovine Microsoft Store.

  • Naslovnica Naslovnica Naslovnica, trenutna stranica.
  • O Twitteru

Spremljena pretraživanja

  • obriši
  • U ovom razgovoru
    Ovjeren akauntZaštićeni tweetovi @
Predloženi korisnici
  • Ovjeren akauntZaštićeni tweetovi @
  • Ovjeren akauntZaštićeni tweetovi @
  • Jezik: Hrvatski
    • Bahasa Indonesia
    • Bahasa Melayu
    • Català
    • Čeština
    • Dansk
    • Deutsch
    • English
    • English UK
    • Español
    • Filipino
    • Français
    • Italiano
    • Magyar
    • Nederlands
    • Norsk
    • Polski
    • Português
    • Română
    • Slovenčina
    • Suomi
    • Svenska
    • Tiếng Việt
    • Türkçe
    • Български език
    • Русский
    • Српски
    • Українська мова
    • Ελληνικά
    • עִבְרִית
    • العربية
    • فارسی
    • मराठी
    • हिन्दी
    • বাংলা
    • ગુજરાતી
    • தமிழ்
    • ಕನ್ನಡ
    • ภาษาไทย
    • 한국어
    • 日本語
    • 简体中文
    • 繁體中文
  • Imate račun? Prijava
    Imate račun?
    · Zaboravili ste lozinku?

    Novi ste na Twitteru?
    Registrirajte se
Profil korisnika/ce wash_cloth
GOOD FRIEND™ - Luxury Edition
GOOD FRIEND™ - Luxury Edition
GOOD FRIEND™ - Luxury Edition
@wash_cloth

Tweets

GOOD FRIEND™ - Luxury Edition

@wash_cloth

gigantic light, river episode, pain hero, rough housing, no truth to rumors that I am over 170 years old

Queens, NY
Vrijeme pridruživanja: kolovoz 2009.

Tweets

  • © 2020 Twitter
  • O Twitteru
  • Centar za pomoć
  • Uvjeti
  • Pravila o privatnosti
  • Imprint
  • Kolačići
  • Informacije o oglasima
Odbaci
Prethodni
Sljedeće

Idite na profil osobe

Spremljena pretraživanja

  • obriši
  • U ovom razgovoru
    Ovjeren akauntZaštićeni tweetovi @
Predloženi korisnici
  • Ovjeren akauntZaštićeni tweetovi @
  • Ovjeren akauntZaštićeni tweetovi @

Odjava

Blokiraj

  • Objavi Tweet s lokacijom

    U tweetove putem weba ili aplikacija drugih proizvođača možete dodati podatke o lokaciji, kao što su grad ili točna lokacija. Povijest lokacija tweetova uvijek možete izbrisati. Saznajte više

    Vaši popisi

    Izradi novi popis


    Manje od 100 znakova, neobavezno

    Privatnost

    Kopiraj vezu u tweet

    Ugradi ovaj Tweet

    Embed this Video

    Dodajte ovaj Tweet na svoje web-mjesto kopiranjem koda u nastavku. Saznajte više

    Dodajte ovaj videozapis na svoje web-mjesto kopiranjem koda u nastavku. Saznajte više

    Hm, došlo je do problema prilikom povezivanja s poslužiteljem.

    Integracijom Twitterova sadržaja u svoje web-mjesto ili aplikaciju prihvaćate Twitterov Ugovor za programere i Pravila za programere.

    Pregled

    Razlog prikaza oglasa

    Prijavi se na Twitter

    · Zaboravili ste lozinku?
    Nemate račun? Registrirajte se »

    Prijavite se na Twitter

    Niste na Twitteru? Registrirajte se, uključite se u stvari koje vas zanimaju, i dobivajte promjene čim se dogode.

    Registrirajte se
    Imate račun? Prijava »

    Dvosmjerni (slanje i primanje) kratki kodovi:

    Država Kod Samo za korisnike
    Sjedinjene Američke Države 40404 (bilo koje)
    Kanada 21212 (bilo koje)
    Ujedinjeno Kraljevstvo 86444 Vodafone, Orange, 3, O2
    Brazil 40404 Nextel, TIM
    Haiti 40404 Digicel, Voila
    Irska 51210 Vodafone, O2
    Indija 53000 Bharti Airtel, Videocon, Reliance
    Indonezija 89887 AXIS, 3, Telkomsel, Indosat, XL Axiata
    Italija 4880804 Wind
    3424486444 Vodafone
    » Pogledajte SMS kratke šifre za druge zemlje

    Potvrda

     

    Dobro došli kući!

    Vremenska crta mjesto je na kojem ćete provesti najviše vremena i bez odgode dobivati novosti o svemu što vam je važno.

    Tweetovi vam ne valjaju?

    Prijeđite pokazivačem preko slike profila pa kliknite gumb Pratim da biste prestali pratiti neki račun.

    Kažite mnogo uz malo riječi

    Kada vidite Tweet koji volite, dodirnite srce – to osobi koja ga je napisala daje do znanja da vam se sviđa.

    Proširite glas

    Najbolji je način da podijelite nečiji Tweet s osobama koje vas prate prosljeđivanje. Dodirnite ikonu da biste smjesta poslali.

    Pridruži se razgovoru

    Pomoću odgovora dodajte sve što mislite o nekom tweetu. Pronađite temu koja vam je važna i uključite se.

    Saznajte najnovije vijesti

    Bez odgode pogledajte o čemu ljudi razgovaraju.

    Pratite više onoga što vam se sviđa

    Pratite više računa da biste dobivali novosti o temama do kojih vam je stalo.

    Saznajte što se događa

    Bez odgode pogledajte najnovije razgovore o bilo kojoj temi.

    Ne propustite nijedan aktualni događaj

    Bez odgode pratite kako se razvijaju događaji koje pratite.

    1. GOOD FRIEND™ - Luxury Edition‏ @wash_cloth 14. velj 2018.
      • Prijavi Tweet

      Biology's solution to the species problem is mostly to say "look, you all know what we're talking about and we have better things to study" which is reasonable and necessary. The species problem becomes more a philosophical issue than a scientific one.

      1 reply 0 proslijeđenih tweetova 8 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
      Prikaži ovu nit
    2. GOOD FRIEND™ - Luxury Edition‏ @wash_cloth 14. velj 2018.
      • Prijavi Tweet

      See, back in high school they taught me Lamarck as a kinda goofball who thought giraffes had long necks because their parents stretched a bunch, then Darwin looked at turtles and finches and saw it weren't true. All of which is wrong.

      1 reply 0 proslijeđenih tweetova 3 korisnika označavaju da im se sviđa
      Prikaži ovu nit
    3. GOOD FRIEND™ - Luxury Edition‏ @wash_cloth 14. velj 2018.
      • Prijavi Tweet

      Lamarck's real error was in the common-wisdom assumption of evolution as a directional, ever-upward escalator with humanity at the top. He explained the continued presence of lower lifeforms as a constant unseen arising from the primordial slime.

      1 reply 0 proslijeđenih tweetova 3 korisnika označavaju da im se sviđa
      Prikaži ovu nit
    4. GOOD FRIEND™ - Luxury Edition‏ @wash_cloth 14. velj 2018.
      • Prijavi Tweet

      Darwin's genius was in recognizing this escalator as an illusion. Upwards, “creative” pressure is not a guarantee—things can evolve towards simpler forms or stay the same indefinitely if conditions favor those outcomes.

      1 reply 0 proslijeđenih tweetova 4 korisnika označavaju da im se sviđa
      Prikaži ovu nit
    5. GOOD FRIEND™ - Luxury Edition‏ @wash_cloth 14. velj 2018.
      • Prijavi Tweet

      The way Lamarck is kept around as a silly foil is kinda ridiculous. If he was a big idiot who couldn't intelligently justify his ideas to the intellectual community then Darwin wouldn't have been challenged to expand on them. “Take my name from me and make it a meme.”

      1 reply 0 proslijeđenih tweetova 5 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
      Prikaži ovu nit
    6. GOOD FRIEND™ - Luxury Edition‏ @wash_cloth 14. velj 2018.
      • Prijavi Tweet

      Scientist myth-making always seems to do this to its own detriment, to record Galileos and Newtons and Darwins as iconoclasts separate from their culture, not than participants. And it's just not like that.

      1 reply 0 proslijeđenih tweetova 4 korisnika označavaju da im se sviđa
      Prikaži ovu nit
    7. GOOD FRIEND™ - Luxury Edition‏ @wash_cloth 14. velj 2018.
      • Prijavi Tweet

      The great scientists are always part of a continuum, building off preexisting ideas, participating in a cultural discussion. If Copernicus' arguments had landed only on deaf ears, heliocentrism would have disappeared. But plenty of others were ready to hear him out.

      1 reply 0 proslijeđenih tweetova 5 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
      Prikaži ovu nit
    8. GOOD FRIEND™ - Luxury Edition‏ @wash_cloth 14. velj 2018.
      • Prijavi Tweet

      Anyhow, better high schools than mine taught August Weismann, a Darwin follower, as the disprover of acquired characteristic heredity when he cut the tails off mice and their grandchildren still had tails, but this is still wrong. I think Scientists have always hated mice.

      1 reply 0 proslijeđenih tweetova 5 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
      Prikaži ovu nit
    9. GOOD FRIEND™ - Luxury Edition‏ @wash_cloth 14. velj 2018.
      • Prijavi Tweet

      By his own admission Weismann's experiments proved nothing, convinced nobody, as Lamarck made claims on use and disuse, not inheritance of mutilated limbs. Weismann's work was writing, where he deduced the mechanism of DNA more than half a century before Crick, Franklin & Watson

      1 reply 0 proslijeđenih tweetova 3 korisnika označavaju da im se sviđa
      Prikaži ovu nit
    10. GOOD FRIEND™ - Luxury Edition‏ @wash_cloth 14. velj 2018.
      • Prijavi Tweet

      It doesn't diminish Newton to recognize to that Einstein essentially proved his equations wrong for large parts of the universe, and it shouldn't diminish Darwin to recognize that his theory required refining. Maybe people are scared of being misinterpreted as creationists?

      1 reply 0 proslijeđenih tweetova 5 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
      Prikaži ovu nit
      GOOD FRIEND™ - Luxury Edition‏ @wash_cloth 14. velj 2018.
      • Prijavi Tweet

      Darwin could never fully abandon inheritance of acquired characteristics, and as we learn more about epigenetics it appears he was somewhat ironically right for the wrong-ish reasons. We do pass down all kinds of things that don't appear directly connected to our DNA.

      14:21 - 14. velj 2018.
      • 5 oznaka „sviđa mi se”
      • Emmet jawbroken Eli Dollarz cory
      1 reply 0 proslijeđenih tweetova 5 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
        1. Novi razgovor
        2. GOOD FRIEND™ - Luxury Edition‏ @wash_cloth 14. velj 2018.
          • Prijavi Tweet

          But he did make a mistake in elevating the Organism as the exclusive unit upon which selection acts. Turns out wrong because the biological hierarchy (Macromolecule|Cell|Tissue|Organ|OrganSystem|Organism|Population|Community|Ecosystem) suffers from its own Species Problem.

          1 reply 0 proslijeđenih tweetova 5 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
          Prikaži ovu nit
        3. GOOD FRIEND™ - Luxury Edition‏ @wash_cloth 14. velj 2018.
          • Prijavi Tweet

          Said twice: the species problem also applies hierarchically and I love it. It's another spot where biology overlaps with philosophy/epistemology/the meaning of language.

          1 reply 0 proslijeđenih tweetova 6 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
          Prikaži ovu nit
        4. GOOD FRIEND™ - Luxury Edition‏ @wash_cloth 14. velj 2018.
          • Prijavi Tweet

          If the minimum definition of an organism is “behaves like life”, then some computer programs or a single RNA strand could be considered organisms.

          1 reply 0 proslijeđenih tweetova 6 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
          Prikaži ovu nit
        5. GOOD FRIEND™ - Luxury Edition‏ @wash_cloth 14. velj 2018.
          • Prijavi Tweet

          If an "organism" is a self-sufficient being with its own unique DNA, then you are more of a colony than an organism, as you require the workings of your mitochondria and gut bacteria to survive, all of which contain their own genetic code.

          1 reply 0 proslijeđenih tweetova 6 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
          Prikaži ovu nit
        6. GOOD FRIEND™ - Luxury Edition‏ @wash_cloth 14. velj 2018.
          • Prijavi Tweet

          If you want to consider your body as the walking vat that holds your brain, then you start to consider yourself an organ or an organ system. I'd recommend you don't do this, but that's a different discussion.

          1 reply 0 proslijeđenih tweetova 5 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
          Prikaži ovu nit
        7. GOOD FRIEND™ - Luxury Edition‏ @wash_cloth 14. velj 2018.
          • Prijavi Tweet

          If the families of mitochondria living within your cells are not organisms themselves but support structures for a larger organism, then perhaps you yourself are simply a support structure for a larger “Humanity” organism.

          0 proslijeđenih tweetova 6 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
          Prikaži ovu nit
        8. GOOD FRIEND™ - Luxury Edition‏ @wash_cloth 14. velj 2018.
          • Prijavi Tweet

          The categories within the hierarchy are as (needfully) reductive as the concept of a species. Definitional barriers are so easily crossed as to be functionally nonexistent, and if nature does not recognize an organism, how could natural selection operate exclusively upon it?

          1 reply 0 proslijeđenih tweetova 3 korisnika označavaju da im se sviđa
          Prikaži ovu nit
        9. GOOD FRIEND™ - Luxury Edition‏ @wash_cloth 14. velj 2018.
          • Prijavi Tweet

          Modern evolutionary theory reinvigorates multilevel selection, a difficult concept Darwin once had to dispense with in order to move the theory forward. It's a fascinating history, and if you want to read more in depth I'd suggest Stephen Jay Gould and Thomas Kuhn

          1 reply 0 proslijeđenih tweetova 7 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
          Prikaži ovu nit
        10. GOOD FRIEND™ - Luxury Edition‏ @wash_cloth 14. velj 2018.
          • Prijavi Tweet

          in summary, biology always verges on soft science, but economics, social science and psychology are never sciences at all since they depend on non-falsifiable assumptions, and Kim Cattrall is 100% in the right while SJP can burn in the scorching winds of Jahannam. #TeamKim

          0 proslijeđenih tweetova 12 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
          Prikaži ovu nit
        11. Kraj razgovora

      Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.

      Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.

        Sponzorirani tweet

        false

        • © 2020 Twitter
        • O Twitteru
        • Centar za pomoć
        • Uvjeti
        • Pravila o privatnosti
        • Imprint
        • Kolačići
        • Informacije o oglasima