Not to mention, what are the implications for modern elections if twitter is a significant source of information for the masses?
-
-
-
very good point
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Do you seriously believe anything
@brianstelter Hillary's propagandist@CNN wants you to think? -
Where are authors's disclosures of COI, methodology & actual "study" which has NOT been peer reviewed?
@brianstelter@CNN
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@CNN Er, Wasim, I agree with your sentiment, but not your maths!Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
you can't just add percentages. if traffic for each was a 60% share, that wouldn't mean bots have a 120% share of the total, right?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
that asymmetrical, automated trolling = perception of breakdown of consensus reality; emboldens real hate; confuses, overwhelms
-
the botnet troll war aspect of this election reminds me of writer who bought fake twitter followers & it upped his real followers
@was3210 - Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
It's not 55%. But that has already been said.pic.twitter.com/FqVZWeJgOd
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
That's not how you add percentages.
-
My bad, sorry!
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.