Wiki edit war on Fermi paradox:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:David_J_Johnson#Regarding_your_recent_reverts_on_.22Fermi_paradox.22 …
#aliens 
-
@warrenm When you reject evidence without rational thought or argument, so do you.
@taoeffect You’re acting like my dismissal isn’t based in rational thought. I’ve read the sources. I’ve made my choice. As have you.
-
-
@warrenm Still waiting for that “basic scrutiny”… Perhaps twitter isn’t the best place for this convo. Feel free to email me. -
@taoeffect Here’s the thing. There are plausible explanations for every such phenomenon on public record. Hardly worth it to recapitulate. -
@warrenm In these instances, I’ve read those “plausible explanations” and have found them to be less plausible than the account itself. -
@taoeffect And yet you dismiss the counterarguments as reductive, passing legitimate arguments off as “swamp gas” lunacy. -
@warrenm I’ve dismissed the counterarguments as less plausible. Example, “monkeys” and “owls” is nuts: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kelly%E2%80%93Hopkinsville_encounter#Possible_alternative_explanations … -
@taoeffect I’m not saying the official story isn’t bogus. I’m saying there’s nothing about it that sounds ET or anything other than mundane. -
@warrenm You should read the full detailed account. Wiki has been redacted a bit since I read that page. -
@taoeffect Can you provide me with a link to it? I’ll definitely review it in detail if you do. - 7 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.