Wiki edit war on Fermi paradox:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:David_J_Johnson#Regarding_your_recent_reverts_on_.22Fermi_paradox.22 …
#aliens 
-
@warrenm "that point is orthogonal the question of whether any evidence exists in the first place"
@taoeffect I would simply say that evidence varies in quality, and the “evidence” provided doesn’t withstand basic scrutiny.
-
-
@warrenm What “basic scrutiny”? You’re welcome to show how it doesn’t. All the scrutiny I’ve seen to date has been wholly unconvincing. -
@taoeffect I don’t have to! If any of it were plausible, it’d be front page news, instead of Weekly World News fodder. -
@warrenm lol. It has been front page news multiple times. -
@taoeffect Sorry, but when you cite the ancient alien hypothesis and Dennis Kucinich’s debate meltdown, you go into the loony bin. -
@warrenm When you reject evidence without rational thought or argument, so do you. -
@taoeffect You’re acting like my dismissal isn’t based in rational thought. I’ve read the sources. I’ve made my choice. As have you. -
@warrenm Still waiting for that “basic scrutiny”… Perhaps twitter isn’t the best place for this convo. Feel free to email me. -
@taoeffect Here’s the thing. There are plausible explanations for every such phenomenon on public record. Hardly worth it to recapitulate. - 13 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.