So someone taking hostages is not attempting terrorism??? Where do you get your logic from??
-
-
-
If they've worked out it's not in pursuit of political aims, then it won't be classed terrorism.pic.twitter.com/v5ymCOhWhv
-
That's the definition of those who don't want you to know the truth
-
No that’s the definition that the word has held for a long time.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
How do you know it’s nothing to do with terror?
-
At a push I’m going with because they are on the scene
-
Ok so they have had a chat with him a known the motive? Causing terror. Las Vegas shooter is classed as a terrorist this guy should be
-
They have spoken to witnesses and it appears he’s a former employee with a monk on. Terrorism has a specific definition as any crime can cause terror to someone, especially the victim...
-
I’ve seen that.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Where is the proof that it's not terrorism related?
-
the fact he was telling most people to get out and only keeping the staff hostage... and reports he was a former employee...
-
Doesn’t need to be Islamic to be a terrorist attack.
-
A former employee only keeping staff hostage is almost certainly someone with a grudge of some kind
-
Rather than someone with a political/religious/ any kind of external motive
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Tommy Robinson heads back to the pub
-
Soft play you mean
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.