This isn't an ontological thought exercise. If they've got a nasty infestation of PONCs, you can see why the 1st Amendment traumatizes them.https://twitter.com/waltshaub/status/892188132786962433 …
-
Yes!!! You get it.
If they were short questions would you call this an ephemeral entomological ontological question? Or just another malapropism?
-
-
if they were as widely applicable as they were brief they might be ecumenical ephemeral entomological ontological questions
-
As a good episcopalian I should have added ecumenical before you got there, but I fear I've joined a knife fight with a paper clip.
-
Oh, here: If their meaning is in the eye of the beholder are they equivocal ecumenical ephemeral entomological ontological questions?
-
if they were also about horses and I could fit equestrian into this list then this would be a query for an equerry
-
Hahaha!!! I would declare you the winner, but the universe beat me to it.
-
I tip my hat to the master and raise the white flag.
-
Love, love this thread, thanks!!!
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
although after this fulsome thread I am starting to wonder if I truly know the meaning of any of these words
-
Those are WORDS!?!?
-
This began as a fantasy about seditious little questions that confound authoritarian instincts. It's late and I have to go tuck them in now.
-
Thank you
@petridishes This has been the highlight of my year. -
Mine too. Now I have to drop everything and painstakingly parse through these passages to propound a precise summary of this palillogy.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.