This isn't an ontological thought exercise. If they've got a nasty infestation of PONCs, you can see why the 1st Amendment traumatizes them.https://twitter.com/waltshaub/status/892188132786962433 …
-
go ahead, PONC, make my day ps i think it's more like semiotics but who cares, you're still the best
Semiotics. Ha! These aren't words, they're seditious little beasts, with their tongues hanging out waiting for you to answer them. ALIVE!
-
-
But is what's at stake their name or their nature? The form or quintessence of a PNOC?
-
Their very existence and its meaning. (Seesh, I had to post this 3 times to overcome autocorrect. What do you call that?)
-
From my slim understanding of Heidegger I'd second "ontological" since it implies that existence and meaning are the same. Just curious
-
but wouldn't that require that the word is the Ding an Sich ? i kant even
-
Apologies, my grasp of kantinental philosophy never was that strong
- End of conversation
New conversation -
-
"seditious little beasts" — ugh so good i can't even BEGIN to come up with a rejoinder. i laughed so hard, thank you. i needed that.
Thanks. Twitter will use this info to make your timeline better. Undo
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.