https://www.c-span.org/video/?431899-1/former-government-ethics-director-speaks-national-press-club …pic.twitter.com/mCZIHFSUWu
-
I'll be glad to look, but regardless of what court may've said, 36 USC s. 501 et seq. 18 USC s. 201 -make it illegal.
We're talking @ different things. I'm talking about a payment Supreme Court decided could be accepted. There's no appealing a Sup Ct opinion
-
SCOTUS inappropriately intrrpreted & applied First Amdt, 18 USC, sec 201 et seq., 18 USC, sec 1951, & 36 USC, s. 501-510, period
Thanks. Twitter will use this info to make your timeline better. Undo -
More specific. Same happened w/ Sen Menendez, VA Gov McDonnell, etc. which are bandaids for Citizens U -where SCOTUS rewrote law
Thanks. Twitter will use this info to make your timeline better. Undo -
That's where u're wrong, unless yr argument is that courts are corrupt, in which case I full agree. New case can be filed 4 cause
Thanks. Twitter will use this info to make your timeline better. Undo
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.