I feel like we've had this conversation before...not sure the Chronicle is paying attention to any other points of view but bashing #twitterstorians. Scholars, if you don't want to be publicly engaged on Twitter. No problem! Don't. But it's not an existential crisis for history.pic.twitter.com/HveQ6WUOXt
-
-
Show this thread
-
But, I guess the author would prefer that we wait 2-7 years for a book or journal article to come out to present the facts when history is abused in the present. cc:
@Lollardfish@KevinMKruse@TheTattooedProf@tlecaque@HC_Richardson@prof_gabriele@SarahEBondShow this thread -
Here's a bibliography that the author and the
@chronicle might actually want to respond to. Rather than journalists, it's actually HISTORIANS talking about their use of Twitter and public media. Imagine that! No wonder grad students don't know about#publichistoryShow this thread - End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
a) Sadly, the author - and editors - know what a tweet is, but not a thread. (Some Twitter messages are quite lengthy.) b) As a non-academic, I follow all the historians I can find on Twitter. I love how they spew facts. They are a continuous education.
-
Also, I am addicted to Historians at the Movies
#hatm (thanks,@HerbertHistory!) - Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.