I don't have a whole lot of disagreements with Peterson, but he's a whore. He regularly exploits his followers by taking paid sponsorships for dating/lifestyle products and posts them on his feed for his impressionable following
-
-
Replying to @pinkypillz
Is that really the case? He uses preferred male and female pronouns, just opposes legislation against the choice not to. As for neutral pronouns, nobody needed convincing not to use them
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @w_guppy @pinkypillz
ᵗʰᵉʳᵉ ᶦˢ ᶰᵒ ᶫᵉᵍᶦˢᶫᵃᵗᶦᵒᶰ ᵃᵍᵃᶦᶰˢᵗ ᵗʰᵉ ᶜʰᵒᶦᶜᵉ ᶰᵒᵗ ᵗᵒ ᶠᵃᵐ
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @pinkypillz @w_guppy
I've checked multiple times and it doesn't look that way tbh, but you live there so I'll take ur word on it
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @adornofthagn @pinkypillz
I think there's been some disagreement on how the bill can be interpreted, but that's the problem - it's too ambiguous. I'm sure if a bill existed in which you could identify areas of free speech of personal interest that were possibly being threatened, you'd oppose it
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @w_guppy @pinkypillz
afaict it's at best that your boss & coworkers can't misgender you, but I could if we meet on the street, and it's not like the average place of employment was otherwise one of unrestrained free expression
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
I think that's a mischaracterisation. Most people don't hate trans people. They're either ignorant or hate being told what to do.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.