Is that really the case? He uses preferred male and female pronouns, just opposes legislation against the choice not to. As for neutral pronouns, nobody needed convincing not to use them
-
The train conductor was like 60 years old and wasn't even aware of what he'd done. The rest of the staff sat on the carriage and tried to knock their heads together to figure out what had happened. None of them knew. If they were educated, they'd have exercised politeness
Legislation only breeds resentment and does more damage in the long run that education would. It's using a band-aid to fix a leaky pipe rather than having it repaired.
-
-
If you're willing to let the government dictate the limits of speech, your less-than-ideal situation is going to come back and hurt you, especially if (God forbid) public opinion on trans people radically shifts to the negative following a few court cases for hate-speech
-
Tweet unavailable
-
not sure if how much of an argument u wanna built on that, the formal possibilities a law provides matter regardless of the likelihood that someone takes advantage of them. tbs, the free speech case is bullshit cuz as I said, workers don't have free speech while working
-
Tweet unavailable
-
well they seem to believe they'll go to jail for being rude/inconsiderate to random strangers, and I think they genuinely believe that, what mystifies me is mostly, why they're so invested in believing that, more a victim complex than transphobia maybe idk
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.