I don't have a whole lot of disagreements with Peterson, but he's a whore. He regularly exploits his followers by taking paid sponsorships for dating/lifestyle products and posts them on his feed for his impressionable following
Is that really the case? He uses preferred male and female pronouns, just opposes legislation against the choice not to. As for neutral pronouns, nobody needed convincing not to use them
-
-
ᵗʰᵉʳᵉ ᶦˢ ᶰᵒ ᶫᵉᵍᶦˢᶫᵃᵗᶦᵒᶰ ᵃᵍᵃᶦᶰˢᵗ ᵗʰᵉ ᶜʰᵒᶦᶜᵉ ᶰᵒᵗ ᵗᵒ ᶠᵃᵐ
-
Tweet unavailable
-
I've checked multiple times and it doesn't look that way tbh, but you live there so I'll take ur word on it
-
I think there's been some disagreement on how the bill can be interpreted, but that's the problem - it's too ambiguous. I'm sure if a bill existed in which you could identify areas of free speech of personal interest that were possibly being threatened, you'd oppose it
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.