That so many neoreactionary movements are comprised of alienated white men who can't find themselves a wife or job simultanously rebuts and affirms their existence. The question must be asked: "Where are all of these losers coming from, and how can we rehabilitate them?"
-
Show this thread
-
The groups which mock these poor sods are almost invariably the people who have brought about the conditions under which these losers have become the chaff of society, and turned rotten
2 replies 0 retweets 14 likesShow this thread -
Replying to @literal_kittler
Well, first of all: when I say "groups" I'm not talking about anything as specific as "SJWs" (I hate this term) but the political ideas which inform the "SJWs" - the ideas which say that certain individuals - either for their skin colour of for their outmoded beliefs - are to go
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @w_guppy @literal_kittler
into the wood-chipper of history without a second question. The people doing most of the chipping are not usually conscious of the forces moving them, but invariably they are operating through some second-hand theory of power which has come dripping out of the academy
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @literal_kittler
Some simple, related examples from our home turf might be: - the comprehensivation of the schooling system; the subsequent (and rarely spoken of) underrepresentation of comprehensively-schooled people in positions of influence
3 replies 0 retweets 3 likes
I agree (and I think private schools should be abolished as it happens) - but this coupled with the following point is a recipe for racial trouble - and the classifying of privilege into distinct ethnic groups rather than looking at individuals has clearly influenced policy here
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.