I think you're talking past one another
-
-
Replying to @chickysandwich @w_guppy
I dont think he means there's anything about the perspectives as such that bar an actual appreciation of lit, but that the sorts of people who adopt criticism from those perspectives happen not to be interested in it, i think
2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
-
Replying to @chickysandwich
No, you're right to take me to task and you make some good points. I agree, both declared and undeclared politics have equal weight on one's understanding of a text. And, since there is no apolitical art, neither can there be apolitical persons with apolitical interpretations ...
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @w_guppy @chickysandwich
... of texts. What I'm objecting to is the cynical and deliberate use of the text to prop up one's politics. I've mentioned marxism, feminism and race studies only because they are the most prevalent in universities, not because I dislike them (I don't).
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @w_guppy @chickysandwich
I think this focus comes at the expense of understanding the text as a text. For instance, at my university (which was not a bad one) almost nobody knew what iambic pentameter was by the second year of or studies. We had, however, been exposed to a good deal of ...
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
... poststructuralist criticism, feminism, marxism and race studies in our first year. These things are all well and good, but when they come at the expense of basic knowledge of meter, form, etc. then the study of literature suffers - (okay, I'm finished)
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.