how can we think 'anti-sexuality' rigorously, i.e. without moralism? not sure if you're joking about victorian prudishness, but... — I can't pretend I have a solution. If Dworkin had a hard time of censoring pornography in the '70...https://curiouscat.me/WillGuppy/post/307856153?1517532032 …
-
"collective moral effort" is not off the cards tho. it's a question of how we analyze the intuition "sex is bad" – that the average fuck or hetero relationship under present conditions has a deep link to recent headline hysteria – into something that eliminates moral judgment.
"Volcel" is a tad more radical and politically charged than what I'm suggesting, which is just a simple return to decency. How that can be analyzed and cemented beyond a vague moral outrage I've no idea, but maybe an analysis of the hormonal economy is the place to find it