For the next month I am only reading Deleuze and verse
-
Parts of PP I liked (just read it last year) but found it limited as an intro to Spinoza & perhaps misleading (eg individual person as primary example of "body"; in general too much biology)
Hate to contradict, but I immediately thought of this passage from PP where he says plainly that a body can be anything. You're right that he uses the human example most often, but I was never under the illusion that it was the supreme example, only the most useful onepic.twitter.com/KP8ahIbRzm
-
-
My point is it's not the most useful, quite the opposite. As there is parallelism between bodies and ideas, then eg the idea "triangle" has a corresponding body - which obvs cannot be a particular triangle.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.