Things can be as essential as you like doesn't mean I'm giving any of my houses away
Yes, and a sensible conception of Darwinism does not take natural selection on the simplistic Spencerian conception of "survival of the fittest," more appropriately and stupidly articulated as "dog eat dog".
-
-
Nor does it consider things only valuable insofar as their relation to other things - "If everything is equal, everything is shit" - but instead sees everything as part of a whole ecosystem which is in constant relation with itself
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Sorry just as you were telling me reality isn't dog eat dog I found some more gruntwork to do... Sounds like you're trying to get ought from is, and your is, the necessity of life or something sounds dubious as well........
-
I'm not saying societies have to be dog eat dog at the individual level, the best way I think is that people can go there separate ways and form different societies, the ultimate horizon they will all face is just a selective one, if the more equal societies survive good for them
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
