@Outsideness the blurb of your book reads like the blurb of a Young Adult scifi novel from 2002pic.twitter.com/Uh7ewgYZcP
-
Are you reading it?
Here and there. The essay on "Kant, Capital and the Prohibition of Incest" was comprehensible enough, but I got lost at Heidegger, who I've never read. Bigbrain goals.
-
-
The editor's introduction is quite helpful, I've read some of the book, yeah I gave up on the Heidegger essay, think you need to read the text he's talking about first
-
The editor's intro was so bloody verbose and ostentatious I could practically see him sniffing his own farts and had to skip over it. Might have to give it another try if you say so
-
the Heidegger text is really more about Trakl anyway (which is good), and in general it's not like the book needs to be read in the right order
-
Good to hear, I'd planned on just picking up whichever essays made the most immediate sense to me at the time
-
This is an ideal order to read the chapters in
pic.twitter.com/KMfJT9yXob
-
The lines crossed, it doesn't count
-
That's it, I'm out
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.