i dont understand why people dont read "will-to-power" in light of "conatus," collective-willing, dissolution of the self into infinite multiplicity of potential being, and so on. especially if they claim to represent "tradition"--much less individualistic than proponents think
The kind of people who espouse a will-to-power, anti-egalitarian ideology are almost invariably the kind of people who would be swallowed whole should it ever be realised *
-
-
-
I guess the obvious interpretation is usually individualistic, at least to philosophy brainlets like me
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.