True. If we are referring to the previous discussion, we have read different authors and reached different conclusions. This is something intolerable to you
-
-
Replying to @literal_kittler @pinkypillz
Specifically, Anthony Malcolm Daniels, a doctor and social worker with experience of malnutrition in poor families and prisoners. More broadly and more profoundly, we differ on the extent to which human will determines outcomes
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @literal_kittler @pinkypillz
Of course they matter, no-one is debating that, but that they negate any individual choice is the question. And of course you only "gather" given that Marxists never read anything outside of their limited bubble
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @literal_kittler @pinkypillz
You are yet to link me to any of the literature, despite banging on about it over several months. I suspect because you more enjoy talking down to people than you do informing them
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Besides which, the idea that individual consumer choice must be the ultimate test withstands any amount of food security analysis (which I'm sure is thorough and convincing) because it still posits that the individual is at the centre of the decision-making process
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
I'm surprised a man of your apparent concern for the poor would use the term "retarded" so often. It's not a word I like to use or read, so I'd ask that you stop using it. Time spent buying groceries and time spent appeasing an under-stimulated academic are not equatable
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.