No, there is still nothing wrong with my original tweet, so long as determinism is defined as the idea that all events, including moral choices, are determined by pre-existing causes
-
Of course they matter, no-one is debating that, but that they negate any individual choice is the question. And of course you only "gather" given that Marxists never read anything outside of their limited bubble
You are yet to link me to any of the literature, despite banging on about it over several months. I suspect because you more enjoy talking down to people than you do informing them
-
-
I was busy working. Most of us don't get paid to sit around reading papers. I happen to have a short window of free time which is why I messaged you today
-
Tweet unavailable
-
Perhaps, just like those poor souls who are socially-bracketed into eating bad food, my work schedule prohibited me from cycling through academic papers when I'd rather read Thackery
-
Tweet unavailable
-
Literature does not exist in a vacuum
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Besides which, the idea that individual consumer choice must be the ultimate test withstands any amount of food security analysis (which I'm sure is thorough and convincing) because it still posits that the individual is at the centre of the decision-making process
-
Tweet unavailable
-
I'm surprised a man of your apparent concern for the poor would use the term "retarded" so often. It's not a word I like to use or read, so I'd ask that you stop using it. Time spent buying groceries and time spent appeasing an under-stimulated academic are not equatable
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.