Similar enough to conflate the two? The "retarded" part of my post was presumably conflating Gramscians and "Cultural Marxists," which you might have picked up as an ironic and deliberate error, since PeterNorway (and yourself) don'thesitate to conflate conservatives and nazis
-
-
Replying to @literal_kittler
I absolutely never said, nor would ever suggest that
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @literal_kittler
Perhaps I should have put "far-right" in quote-marks, to make it absolutely clear that I was using the term with some irony. The quoted tweet suggests that Peterson is the new "far-right" and that his use of "cultural marxism" is linked to Breivik's use of the term
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @w_guppy @literal_kittler
If you think that others will take it at face value, and that it might act as some kind of dog-whistle, I will take it down. As for being a miserable little sophist, I make no claim, have no responsibility, and take no payment to be otherwise
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @literal_kittler
I'm not really a fan of Peterson, but I don't think he has seriously considered enforced monogomy, and his conception of nature is a fairly conservative hallmark, not a far-right one. The democrats are probably "far-left" as far as social politics goes
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like
Speaking as Peterson, and considering that the family unit is probably the core of conservatism, I'd say that the Democrats positions on abortion and welfare would place them on the "far-left" if we're talking about social politics
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.