I have to say that, since joining /lit/ twitter, I've been disappointed by the overemphasis on philosophy and politics (boring) and the underemphasis on literature. And where the latter is employed, it's only as a vehicle for the former two
-
-
You can definitely try out new ideas and be sincere without fear of recourse. I think actually agree that it is more suited to literature to discussion than here.
-
I left for a reason though. In an anonymous environment like /lit/, the group just ends up in a stasis and nothing ever progresses.
-
There are some advantages. Namely that each post is judged on its own merit, cults and sycopahncy are less likely to form, there is an honest (and frequently brutual) critique of one-another's writing and opinions are not withheld for fear of being expelled from a community
-
Yeah, I definitely agree. I think it's why you've seen things like curious cat used around here so much to bring in some of these benefits.
-
One problem is that it is just impossible to any kind of sustained conversation. Anything that doesn't transpire in minutes can't happen. This leaves the environment sterile to all but certain types of ideas. Once you've seen all of those, there is no reason to stay.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.