I think the idea is that the cultural christianity isn't real christianity, and that to really retain religious identity requires isolating from the free market, and Islam is doing that better than christianity is
Why do some think that Islam has some special invulnerability against the market that isn't shared by Christianity? That the free market was born out of, and likely integrated parts of protestantism, would suggest that a cultural christianity has the best case of survival, no?
-
-
-
But people who have that idea probably devalue protestantism in general
-
I think it's a weird paradox that England, which has essentially become de facto secular since the reformation, has retained (for better or worse) a tinge of religious sentiment which has made it more christian than other, more stridently religious states
-
But it's probably true that it's not Christianity in a strict sense. But hey, you can be orthodox or you can be effective
-
Christianity has undercover characteristics. Maybe it's even at its best when it doesn't name itself
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.